Ann Coulter, who has been outstripped as reigning diva of the right by our own Governor Palin, launched into a full-throated defense of the Vice Presidential nominee today as only she can.
The link above will take you to Ann Coulter’s webpage, which has the Palin article on the front page currently. But just to whet your appetite, here are a few of Ann Coulter’s nuggets of wisdom:
After drawing “Keith + Obama” hearts on their denim notebooks, Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews stayed up all night last Thursday, writing jokes about Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, the presumed vice presidential pick. Now they can’t use any of them.
So the media are taking it out on our brave Sarah and her 17-year-old daughter.
She went on to comment on Troopergate:
They tried to create a “Troopergate” for Palin, indignantly demanding to know why she wanted to get her ex-brother-in-law removed as a state trooper. Again, public corruption is not a good issue for someone like Obama, Chicago pol and noted friend of Syrian National/convicted felon Antonin Rezko.
For the cherry on top, then we found out Palin’s ex-brother-in-law had Tasered his own 10-year-old stepson. Defend that, Democrats.
And last but certainly not least:
When liberals start acting like they’re opposed to pre-marital sex and mothers having careers, you know McCain’s vice presidential choice has knocked them back on their heels.
Truer words have never been written.
Enjoy!
“For the cherry on top, then we found out Palin’s ex-brother-in-law had Tasered his own 10-year-old stepson. Defend that, Democrats.”
Fact is we don’t have to defend the brother-in-laws actions. It is not about his behavior, it is about Palin’s and if she misused her power. To take the attitude that those in the power authority can break the rules, because they felt justified, is spitting at our Constitution and the basic premise of the United States of America.
Following excerpt taken from:
http://usconservatives.about.com/b/2008/09/05/emerging-facts-about-alaska-state-trooper-mike-wooten.htm
“Wooten, a four-time divorcee with an extensive record of questionable conduct, isn’t exactly the sympathetic character the Democrats and the media have been making him out to be.
The question, it appears, shouldn’t be, “Did Palin try to have him fired?” but, “Why has this guy not been fired?”
Wooten has a history of reprimands as a trooper, along with a series of personal indiscretions as well. Perhaps the most heinous of these is the one Wooten has admitted to: electrocuting his 11-year-old step son with a taser, allegedly to teach him a lesson. He’s also been accused of drinking on the job (which he denies), killing a moose illegaly (which he also denies), and according to this story at DigitalJournal.com threatening to kill Palin’s father — a retired elementary school teacher.
More is sure to come, so we’ll have to stay tuned, but in the meantime it’s easy to see why Palin was so eager for this investigation to unfold.”
Go Maverick.
Vernongop.WordPress.com
Typical liberal. When you like what the elected official did in their office, you praise them. But when you don’t like it… “They acted outside their authority”. If a State Trooper would Taser his own 10 year old child, the StateTrooper had a real issue to be dealt with.
Carl Slicer, blog editor, http://www.VernonGop.com “Who do you trust ?”
February 1, 2009
Hello Ms. Coutler:
Below is my book proposal. Could you kindly suggest an agent or a publisher for it?
Roman Brackman
I want to publish a book entirely focused on Watergate to reveal that Watergate scandal was a hoax and a ruse by the anti-Vietnam War left-wing liberals who used John Dean to reverse Nixon’s 1972 landslide victory to satisfy their camouflaged wish for American defeat in Vietnam. In Chapter 8 – “Watergate and the Yom Kippur War” of my book “Israel at High Noon” (2006) I stated that the “Deep Throat,” the mysterious source of Watergate “revelations,” was John Dean, who, at the time of the break-in, was the Counsel to the President in the Nixon White House and who became the “star witness” against President Nixon during the Watergate hearings. I would be happy to send you this book if you indicate an interest. It has a lot of factual information.
History tells us that leaders who failed to deliver on a silver platter a quick and glorious victory to their people have been hated by these people who demanded a change. After the protracted WW1 the German Emperor was exiled and the Russian Tsar and his entire family were murdered. French history offers another example. Dissatisfied with protracted wars and taxation, the Paris mob on July 14 1789 stormed Bastille prison, freeing 7 common criminals, among them Marquis de Sade, the infamous sadist, who shouted to the enraged mob, “They are killing the prisoners here!” which caused a riot. King Louis XVI was guillotined and his wife Marie-Antoinette, who was accused of changing her dresses every day, met the same fate. Their son, the Dauphin, suffered a terrible death in prison. Napoleon became the Emperor of France. Hitler the Fuhrer, Stalin the Vozhd and Napoleon the Emperor popped up from nowhere.
Harry Truman had even lower rating during the long Korean War than Bush had during the Iraq War. Bob Herbert in his Op-Ed article wrote, “Anger at George W. Bush is white-hot.” (NYT, August 26, p.19) There is a link between the “white-hot” hatred of Nixon and Bush because of their quest for American victory in the unpopular wars in Vietnam and Iraq. As Leonard Garment, who became Counsel in the Nixon White House after Nixon had fired John Dean, wrote:
Watergate grew out of a dispute about Richard Nixon prosecution of the Vietnam War. This dispute was, in political terms virtually irresolvable. (The New York Times, Nov. 19, 2000, WK 15)
In 1974 I published an article “John Dean Behind the Mask of Sanity.” (I will send you this article if you express an interest.) My perception of Dean was influence by the book “THE MASK OF SANITY” (1955) by Hervey Cleckley, M.D. who sited dozens of cases of seemingly normal people, some of them successful businessmen, lawyers, doctors and other professionals, who were afflicted by moral blindness and habitually committed various crimes, but often wiggled out of punishment by blaming others and projecting their guilt on them. In January 2001, after having kept silent for more than a quarter century, Gordon Liddy finally revealed in his sworn testimony in Philadelphia court that it was John Dean who ordered the Watergate break-in. (The New York Times, January 30, 2001, p. A-19) This important information was delegated to p. 19 and probably was dismissed by people who did not want to admit even to themselves that they were duped by, as General Alexander Haig put it to Leon Jaworski, “The tapes after March 21 show Dean to be a subtle but clever liar.” (Jaworski, (The Right and the Power, pp. 151-152). John Dean ordered Gordon Liddy to organize the Watergate break-in and then projected his guilt on other people, including President Nixon to avoid punishment. Not long ago Mark Felt, a senile 91–year-old former FBI official, was paraded by the mainstream media as the “real Deep Throat.” Now Mark Felt is dead. But in 1979 when Felt was alive and not senile, he published his book “The FBI Pyramid from Inside” in which he stated emphatically:
I never leaked information to Woodward and Bernstein or anyone else.
Below is my published letter to the New York Times Editor about Nixon and Watergate, dated April 12, 1974. Recently I received a letter of rejection from a literary agent who wrote: “I don’t think the book is something I can sell. I’m someone who’s heard too much of Watergate. I am sure another agent will be more enthusiastic, as there is a sizable audience still fascinated by it.” I hope you might suggest an agent or a publisher for my book on John Dean and Watergate. This is the reason I burdened you with this communication.
It is not easy to publish an article if it does not fit into the prevailing point of view in the Mainstream Media. Bernard Goldberg’s book “A Slobbering Love Affair –Starring Barack Obama-The True (and Pathetic) Story of the Torrid Romance between Barack Obama and the Mainstream Media” was a great joy to read. To me This book brought back the memory of twenty years of futile attempts to publish in the U.S. my book “The Secret File of Joseph Stalin – A Hidden life” which was eventually published in English (London 2001), in French (Paris 2003), in Russian (Moscow 2004). American scholars did not want to recommend publication of this book – it contradicted what they had been teaching generations of students and made the required reading of published Stalin biographies. My book was first published after Colonel David M. Glantz, US Army sent his comments to the British publisher:
Brackman’s approach synthesizes the vast amount of fragmentary information on Stalin, “the man“ to form an imposing and unprecedented psychological portrait. Indeed, Stalin comes to life and emerges “real” in the book. No other existing work has accomplished this feat. There are many published biographies and portraits of Stalin. None, however, places a proper face on the man or explain why he acted as he did. This book does both.
Christopher Andrew in The Sunday Times review stated:
There is much in The Secret File of Joseph Stalin that challenges conventional interpretations of Stalin’s dictatorship… Brackman’s claim that Stalin had been an Okhrana agent also deserves to be taken seriously.
In a two page article in the Russian newspaper Nikolai Yamskoy reviewed my book stating in part:
The history of the file is one of the most captivating scenes in R. Brackman’s book. In essence, this is the real “History KPSU” instead of the falsified one, which was fed to us for decades and in part still has continued to be fed to us in ‘politcorrect’ books in schools and universities (Nicolai Yamskoy, “Our History-The Hidden Life of the Kremlin Boss” Russkiy Kurier, December 2, 2004, pp. 26-27)
Francois Kersaudy, Sorbonne University Professor, published a 10 page review of my Stalin book in the February 2003 issue of the Paris magazine Historia with the cover title Staline – Agent du Tsar. There were many gloving reviews of my Stalin book in the Russian, Israeli, British and American press ever since.
My published books are listed on amazon.com but. I have never had an agent. I hope you might suggest an agent or a publisher for my book on John Dean and Watergate. This is the reason I burdened you with this communication.
Sincerely,
Roman Brackman Ph.D.
700 Fort Washington Ave. apt. 5-D
New York City, NY 10040
Tel. (212) 740-8744
Tel. (845) 292-6534 (during summers)
E-mail: nadrom@nyc.rr.com
Website: romanbrackman.com
The New York Times, FRIDAY, APRIL 12. 1974
Letters to the Editor
‘If the President Withdrew. . .’
To the Editor:
Senator Buckley in his much pub¬licized statement said “If the Presi¬dent withdrew, this crisis would be resolved.” It would not. On the con¬trary, the real crisis would only begin. The President’s resignation would deal a devastating blow to the legitimacy of our form of government, and not only to the office of the President, .but also to the very genesis of our country-its Constitution.
It would deal a deadly blow to the foundation of our system of justice – the presumption of innocence before proven guilty. The President’s resigna¬tion would be widely interpreted as acknowledgment of guilt. The Senator went so far as to imply the President’s guilt by association only because some of the people in the White House night have committed a crime. ”
The Senator’s statement that his call for the President’s resignation does not imply any belief on his part in the President’s guilt or innocence is puzzling. If the President is inno¬cent of any crime, why should he re¬sign? If the President were to resign, he would set a. frightening precedent.
Any future President could be removed from office only because some fantastic charges gained wide publicity. The next logical step would be to remove the legally elected head of State by public opinion poll, or by par¬tisan cabal, which chooses to ignore the only constitutional procedure, that of impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate.
It is not the agony of the perfectly legal impeachment proceedings which would tear the country apart, as the Senator suggests, but the agony and the pervasive sense of guilt stemming from the destruction of an innocent man which would result in endless recriminations, strife, bitterness, and quite possibly in a civil war. Removal of a head of state by illegal means or pressure had precisely such results, as history shows so clearly.
President Nixon will stand tall in history for his courage and statesman¬ship in his foreign policy initiatives, for his courageous, if unpopular at that time, decisions on Vietnam and Cambodia, in September 1970 during the Jordanian crisis, in last October’s Mideast war, and not the least in im¬portance, for his remarkable endur¬ance to stay in office and to uphold our Constitution despite pressure from his opponents and his friends.
The President will not resign be¬cause by following the Senator’s ad-vice he would place the future of this country and indeed of the world in jeopardy.
ROMAN BRACKMAN
Chappaqua, N.Y. Mar. 29, 1974.
February 1, 2009
Hello Ms. Coutler:
Below is my book proposal. Could you kindly suggest an agent or a publisher for it?
I want to publish a book entirely focused on Watergate to reveal that Watergate scandal was a hoax and a ruse by the anti-Vietnam War left-wing liberals who used John Dean to reverse Nixon’s 1972 landslide victory to satisfy their camouflaged wish for American defeat in Vietnam. In Chapter 8 – “Watergate and the Yom Kippur War” of my book “Israel at High Noon” (2006) I stated that the “Deep Throat,” the mysterious source of Watergate “revelations,” was John Dean, who, at the time of the break-in, was the Counsel to the President in the Nixon White House and who became the “star witness” against President Nixon during the Watergate hearings. I would be happy to send you this book if you indicate an interest. It has a lot of factual information.
History tells us that leaders who failed to deliver on a silver platter a quick and glorious victory to their people have been hated by these people who demanded a change. After the protracted WW1 the German Emperor was exiled and the Russian Tsar and his entire family were murdered. French history offers another example. Dissatisfied with protracted wars and taxation, the Paris mob on July 14 1789 stormed Bastille prison, freeing 7 common criminals, among them Marquis de Sade, the infamous sadist, who shouted to the enraged mob, “They are killing the prisoners here!” which caused a riot. King Louis XVI was guillotined and his wife Marie-Antoinette, who was accused of changing her dresses every day, met the same fate. Their son, the Dauphin, suffered a terrible death in prison. Napoleon became the Emperor of France. Hitler the Fuhrer, Stalin the Vozhd and Napoleon the Emperor popped up from nowhere.
Harry Truman had even lower rating during the long Korean War than Bush had during the Iraq War. Bob Herbert in his Op-Ed article wrote, “Anger at George W. Bush is white-hot.” (NYT, August 26, p.19) There is a link between the “white-hot” hatred of Nixon and Bush because of their quest for American victory in the unpopular wars in Vietnam and Iraq. As Leonard Garment, who became Counsel in the Nixon White House after Nixon had fired John Dean, wrote:
Watergate grew out of a dispute about Richard Nixon prosecution of the Vietnam War. This dispute was, in political terms virtually irresolvable. (The New York Times, Nov. 19, 2000, WK 15)
In 1974 I published an article “John Dean Behind the Mask of Sanity.” (I will send you this article if you express an interest.) My perception of Dean was influence by the book “THE MASK OF SANITY” (1955) by Hervey Cleckley, M.D. who sited dozens of cases of seemingly normal people, some of them successful businessmen, lawyers, doctors and other professionals, who were afflicted by moral blindness and habitually committed various crimes, but often wiggled out of punishment by blaming others and projecting their guilt on them. In January 2001, after having kept silent for more than a quarter century, Gordon Liddy finally revealed in his sworn testimony in Philadelphia court that it was John Dean who ordered the Watergate break-in. (The New York Times, January 30, 2001, p. A-19) This important information was delegated to p. 19 and probably was dismissed by people who did not want to admit even to themselves that they were duped by, as General Alexander Haig put it to Leon Jaworski, “The tapes after March 21 show Dean to be a subtle but clever liar.” (Jaworski, (The Right and the Power, pp. 151-152). John Dean ordered Gordon Liddy to organize the Watergate break-in and then projected his guilt on other people, including President Nixon to avoid punishment. Not long ago Mark Felt, a senile 91–year-old former FBI official, was paraded by the mainstream media as the “real Deep Throat.” Now Mark Felt is dead. But in 1979 when Felt was alive and not senile, he published his book “The FBI Pyramid from Inside” in which he stated emphatically:
I never leaked information to Woodward and Bernstein or anyone else.
Below is my published letter to the New York Times Editor about Nixon and Watergate, dated April 12, 1974. Recently I received a letter of rejection from a literary agent who wrote: “I don’t think the book is something I can sell. I’m someone who’s heard too much of Watergate. I am sure another agent will be more enthusiastic, as there is a sizable audience still fascinated by it.” I hope you might suggest an agent or a publisher for my book on John Dean and Watergate. This is the reason I burdened you with this communication.
It is not easy to publish an article if it does not fit into the prevailing point of view in the Mainstream Media. Bernard Goldberg’s book “A Slobbering Love Affair –Starring Barack Obama-The True (and Pathetic) Story of the Torrid Romance between Barack Obama and the Mainstream Media” was a great joy to read. To me This book brought back the memory of twenty years of futile attempts to publish in the U.S. my book “The Secret File of Joseph Stalin – A Hidden life” which was eventually published in English (London 2001), in French (Paris 2003), in Russian (Moscow 2004). American scholars did not want to recommend publication of this book – it contradicted what they had been teaching generations of students and made the required reading of published Stalin biographies. My book was first published after Colonel David M. Glantz, US Army sent his comments to the British publisher:
Brackman’s approach synthesizes the vast amount of fragmentary information on Stalin, “the man“ to form an imposing and unprecedented psychological portrait. Indeed, Stalin comes to life and emerges “real” in the book. No other existing work has accomplished this feat. There are many published biographies and portraits of Stalin. None, however, places a proper face on the man or explain why he acted as he did. This book does both.
Christopher Andrew in The Sunday Times review stated:
There is much in The Secret File of Joseph Stalin that challenges conventional interpretations of Stalin’s dictatorship… Brackman’s claim that Stalin had been an Okhrana agent also deserves to be taken seriously.
In a two page article in the Russian newspaper Nikolai Yamskoy reviewed my book stating in part:
The history of the file is one of the most captivating scenes in R. Brackman’s book. In essence, this is the real “History KPSU” instead of the falsified one, which was fed to us for decades and in part still has continued to be fed to us in ‘politcorrect’ books in schools and universities (Nicolai Yamskoy, “Our History-The Hidden Life of the Kremlin Boss” Russkiy Kurier, December 2, 2004, pp. 26-27)
Francois Kersaudy, Sorbonne University Professor, published a 10 page review of my Stalin book in the February 2003 issue of the Paris magazine Historia with the cover title Staline – Agent du Tsar. There were many gloving reviews of my Stalin book in the Russian, Israeli, British and American press ever since.
My published books are listed on amazon.com but. I have never had an agent. I hope you might suggest an agent or a publisher for my book on John Dean and Watergate. This is the reason I burdened you with this communication.
Sincerely,
Roman Brackman Ph.D.
700 Fort Washington Ave. apt. 5-D
New York City, NY 10040
Tel. (212) 740-8744
Tel. (845) 292-6534 (during summers)
E-mail: nadrom@nyc.rr.com
Website: romanbrackman.com
The New York Times, FRIDAY, APRIL 12. 1974
Letters to the Editor
‘If the President Withdrew. . .’
To the Editor:
Senator Buckley in his much pub¬licized statement said “If the Presi¬dent withdrew, this crisis would be resolved.” It would not. On the con¬trary, the real crisis would only begin. The President’s resignation would deal a devastating blow to the legitimacy of our form of government, and not only to the office of the President, .but also to the very genesis of our country-its Constitution.
It would deal a deadly blow to the foundation of our system of justice – the presumption of innocence before proven guilty. The President’s resigna¬tion would be widely interpreted as acknowledgment of guilt. The Senator went so far as to imply the President’s guilt by association only because some of the people in the White House night have committed a crime. ”
The Senator’s statement that his call for the President’s resignation does not imply any belief on his part in the President’s guilt or innocence is puzzling. If the President is inno¬cent of any crime, why should he re¬sign? If the President were to resign, he would set a. frightening precedent.
Any future President could be removed from office only because some fantastic charges gained wide publicity. The next logical step would be to remove the legally elected head of State by public opinion poll, or by par¬tisan cabal, which chooses to ignore the only constitutional procedure, that of impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate.
It is not the agony of the perfectly legal impeachment proceedings which would tear the country apart, as the Senator suggests, but the agony and the pervasive sense of guilt stemming from the destruction of an innocent man which would result in endless recriminations, strife, bitterness, and quite possibly in a civil war. Removal of a head of state by illegal means or pressure had precisely such results, as history shows so clearly.
President Nixon will stand tall in history for his courage and statesman¬ship in his foreign policy initiatives, for his courageous, if unpopular at that time, decisions on Vietnam and Cambodia, in September 1970 during the Jordanian crisis, in last October’s Mideast war, and not the least in im¬portance, for his remarkable endur¬ance to stay in office and to uphold our Constitution despite pressure from his opponents and his friends.
The President will not resign be¬cause by following the Senator’s ad-vice he would place the future of this country and indeed of the world in jeopardy.
ROMAN BRACKMAN
Chappaqua, N.Y. Mar. 29, 1974.